Introduction to A
Contribution to the Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy
of Right Karl Marx in Deutsch-Französische
Jahrbücher, February, 1844
For Germany, the criticism
of religion has been essentially completed, and
the criticism of religion is the prerequisite of all
criticism.
The profane existence
of error is compromised as soon as its heavenly
oratio pro aris et focis
[“speech for
the altars and hearths”]
has been refuted. Man, who has found only the
reflection of himself in the fantastic reality
of heaven, where he sought a superman, will no
longer feel disposed to find the mere appearance
of himself, the non-man
[Unmensch],
where he seeks and must seek his true reality.
The foundation of irreligious
criticism is: Man makes religion, religion
does not make man. Religion is, indeed, the
self-consciousness and self-esteem of man who has
either not yet won through to himself, or has
already lost himself again. But man is no
abstract being squatting outside the world. Man is
the world of man – state, society. This
state and this society produce religion, which is an
inverted consciousness of the world, because
they are an inverted world. Religion is the
general theory of this world, its encyclopaedic
compendium, its logic in popular form, its spiritual
point d’honneur, its enthusiasm, its moral
sanction, its solemn complement, and its universal
basis of consolation and justification. It is the
fantastic realization of the human essence since
the human essence has not acquired any true
reality. The struggle against religion is,
therefore, indirectly the struggle against that
world whose spiritual aroma is religion.
Religious
suffering is, at one and the same time, the
expression of real suffering and a protest
against real suffering. Religion is the sigh of the
oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world,
and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the
opium of the people. |